How can Lean Thinking be described?
Lean thinking is the process of creating a higher value without the waste that is traditionally involved in manufacture or in other areas. Normally we expect lean thinking to be combined with manufacturing, as it was originally begun by the Toyota Corporation.
Lean thinking was originally designed to boost and enhance the end user value while at the same time decreasing the price and eradicating waste. Toyota noted seven major areas of waste in their manufacturing and worked very hard to lower this waste and to present a much higher value at a lesser price. Toyotismas is another name the process is called along with the more well known name lean thinking.
The high degree of success that was involved in the lean thinking process and the level of growth that Toyota achieved using it has called lean thinking to mind and many companies and even institutions of higher learning have adapted the lean thinking process to their own industry or organization.
Lean Thinking as Seen in the World of Education
Lean thinking in the realm of higher education can be considered taking lean thinking in its manufacturing process form that has been revamped for colleges and universities to give the student maximum value for a lowered price. Lean management and lean thinking have become a bit more common in areas related to college administration. In facets such as admission, budgeting, hiring, and facilities management, leaning thinking contributes to huge improvements. Although you will not see it widely used in universities, several have become pioneers in lean thinking, leading to its integration in other areas of university life. Even variants and applications of lean thinking have been used with the procurement of feedback from students, structures of teaching methods, and various unique academic processes. The universities that have utilized lean thinking the most and use it to the greatest degree are pioneering venues such as the St Andrews in Scotland, Cardiff University in Wales and University of Oklahoma in the United States. Various other universities have also joined the club here and these would be Winona State University and Rensselaer, which are both in the USA.
You will find quite a number of differences in lean thinking when it is put into the realm of higher education in relation to what is seen in the business or manufacturing sector. In the university education world, lean thinking can follow along with the same processes as it would in a lean management approach that would be found in a corporation. This will take into account differences as well as looking into numerous different structures and the method of governing put in place in higher education.
Universities have at times been resistive to the use of lean education because it defines the student as the customer and the teacher and the college as the employee who must prove their worth to the end user--the student.Teaching and university administration is very similar to administration of the corporation but there are some differences in the way in which the government regulates it. In addition, there are some changes in the teaching processes. These are taken into account but by and large, university learning is made up of processes that are repeated over and over.
Because of these factors, lean education will be used to a huge degree of success. In some areas, the student will be called a customer although terminology of this nature has been met with a lot of resistance from scores of schools in questions. Generally, the term student-customer has achieved quite a bit of acceptance. There are quite a number of reasons why this is so and the term customer will be thought out as an important aspect of lean management or a form of lean education methodology. For the end user to have any value, an actual customer must exist.
The value that can be gained along with the shaved costs might be passed to the end user, the student/customer, would be among the reasons why lean education is viewed as being more acceptable by the numerous universities and, ironically, it is the same reason why it may be resisted by other universities.
Lean thinking is the process of creating a higher value without the waste that is traditionally involved in manufacture or in other areas. Normally we expect lean thinking to be combined with manufacturing, as it was originally begun by the Toyota Corporation.
Lean thinking was originally designed to boost and enhance the end user value while at the same time decreasing the price and eradicating waste. Toyota noted seven major areas of waste in their manufacturing and worked very hard to lower this waste and to present a much higher value at a lesser price. Toyotismas is another name the process is called along with the more well known name lean thinking.
The high degree of success that was involved in the lean thinking process and the level of growth that Toyota achieved using it has called lean thinking to mind and many companies and even institutions of higher learning have adapted the lean thinking process to their own industry or organization.
Lean Thinking as Seen in the World of Education
Lean thinking in the realm of higher education can be considered taking lean thinking in its manufacturing process form that has been revamped for colleges and universities to give the student maximum value for a lowered price. Lean management and lean thinking have become a bit more common in areas related to college administration. In facets such as admission, budgeting, hiring, and facilities management, leaning thinking contributes to huge improvements. Although you will not see it widely used in universities, several have become pioneers in lean thinking, leading to its integration in other areas of university life. Even variants and applications of lean thinking have been used with the procurement of feedback from students, structures of teaching methods, and various unique academic processes. The universities that have utilized lean thinking the most and use it to the greatest degree are pioneering venues such as the St Andrews in Scotland, Cardiff University in Wales and University of Oklahoma in the United States. Various other universities have also joined the club here and these would be Winona State University and Rensselaer, which are both in the USA.
You will find quite a number of differences in lean thinking when it is put into the realm of higher education in relation to what is seen in the business or manufacturing sector. In the university education world, lean thinking can follow along with the same processes as it would in a lean management approach that would be found in a corporation. This will take into account differences as well as looking into numerous different structures and the method of governing put in place in higher education.
Universities have at times been resistive to the use of lean education because it defines the student as the customer and the teacher and the college as the employee who must prove their worth to the end user--the student.Teaching and university administration is very similar to administration of the corporation but there are some differences in the way in which the government regulates it. In addition, there are some changes in the teaching processes. These are taken into account but by and large, university learning is made up of processes that are repeated over and over.
Because of these factors, lean education will be used to a huge degree of success. In some areas, the student will be called a customer although terminology of this nature has been met with a lot of resistance from scores of schools in questions. Generally, the term student-customer has achieved quite a bit of acceptance. There are quite a number of reasons why this is so and the term customer will be thought out as an important aspect of lean management or a form of lean education methodology. For the end user to have any value, an actual customer must exist.
The value that can be gained along with the shaved costs might be passed to the end user, the student/customer, would be among the reasons why lean education is viewed as being more acceptable by the numerous universities and, ironically, it is the same reason why it may be resisted by other universities.
via oneofthebest
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire